Mandatory 2FA "Feature"

Marley_Ring -

I think you are being disingenuous in trying to claim (in multiple threads) that Ring’s current implementation of 2FA is “an effort to stay in line with industry’s best practices”. Seriously, can you think of anyone that has a less desirable implementation? (Is it safe to assume that you were ordered to create the posts by someone in authority?)

I would think that individual forum members who know at least a little about 2FA could quickly come up with a list of objections to Ring’s 2FA implementation. In fact, presumably, the more such individuals learn about Ring’s implementation, the longer their lists would become.

With that in mind, I’d like to suggest that forum members:

  • Look at every 2FA thread in the “Feature Request Board” and vote for all the ones you agree with
  • For forum members who are knowledgeable about 2FA issues… consider creating a thread in the “Feature Request Board” where all forum members can both vote for the thread (and list all their objections to Ring’s 2FA implementation).